Reading
chapters eight through ten of Kevin Williams’ book I Want My MTV delves into perception as they further elaborate on
the nature of the audio-visual relationship. The relationship is further
explored through discussing the medical phenomenon known as synesthesia as well
as applying it as a term involving two different sensory mediums (i.e. audio
and visual) being combined to form a new perspective. In addition, the chapters
explore the physical and spiritual aspects that involve music video, as
chapters 9 and 10 will elaborate.
Chapter
eight discusses ‘synesthesia’ which is defined as: ““the experience of an
associated sensation when another sense is stimulated.”” (Ch. 8, 13). The most
common example of synesthesia is a person being able to see colors, shapes, and
other hallucinations when stimulated by sound. There are people diagnosed with
synesthesia in which their senses are cross wired in the brain and thus other
combinations include being able to taste flavors when speaking words, hearing
colors, or associating numbers to having personalities.
Synesthesia is not an
individual phenomenon as Williams proves that everyone has some limited form of
synesthesia: “
“In 1934 Hartman conducted another
experiment using the Seashore test of music ability which was administered
under the conditions of varying the amount of light in the room; the light was
shifted from 510 watts to as complete darkness as possible. Hartman concluded
that “the statistical treatment here followed shows that the mean auditory
efficiency…is definitely better by about three percent in the light than in the
dark.” (p. 819). In other words, according to Hartman, people hear better in well-lit
rooms. While better is difficult to measure, it seems clear that vision
resonates with aural experience, and conversely, aural experience resonates
with visual experience.” (Ch. 8, 17).
By
rooting synesthesia as a biologically universal phenomenon rather than an
individual psychological profile, we can now understand music’s relationship to
the body: “Writing about music is far from stupid because music can teach us so
much about the ecological and communicative relationship between the body (an
organism), its environment (in our case, socio-cultural), and the Environment
(or, world; see Lanigan, 1899).” (Ch. 8, 24).
The
idea that music, a technological construct, has a relationship with the body is
touched on in chapter nine. Technology is seen as an extension of the body as
it enhances our perception: “Technology makes manifest the latent, or, put
another way, it makes our present to out awareness that which was always
already present but hidden from perception.” (Ch. 9, 5). The text provides an
example detailing the invention of the film camera, how it all began with a bet
to see if all four of a horse’s hooves could not touch the ground if still in
motion. It turned out to be true, but the fact that it revealed something that
is hidden proves how technology enhances our perspective on things: “The
machine is thus “incorporated into the human intentional act of perceiving the
world, even as the machine enables a patently ‘impossible’ human perception,
that is, one otherwise unrealizable without the machine’s incorporation.” (Ch.
9, 7).
Chapter
ten revisits the topic of aesthetics from chapters five through seven by
discussing how aesthetics influence and are a byproduct of perspective. However,
the main topic is logos and echos, to which they are defined respectively as:
“not only denotes reason, but also the expression of reason, and the order
perceived in things, word, universe, discourse, definition, formula, principle
and ration.” (Ch. 10, 3). And “the mode of televisual/video address as a
multimedia presentation which draws on sight and sound writing and speaking,
orality and literacy, hearing and listening in its overlapping and
interpenetrating presentation of images, words, sounds, music, and so on.” (Ch.
10, 6).
Earlier
in the paragraph, I said aesthetics influence and are the byproducts of
perspective, what happens if several forms are intermingled?
“The Western complementary and contrary
to the Apollonian is the Dionysian the twin brother or the double of identity,
fixity, and objectivity. The Apollonian gives us the thing as thing, an object,
with its form, contour and plasticity. The Dionysian understanding obliterates
the thing’s ontological status. The Dionysian traverses an awareness of
aesthetics which brings to light the superfluity of aesthetic awareness—the
aisthetic.” (Ch. 10, 18).
Williams
adds Eastern philosophies to his argument:
“The Confucian Doctrine functions to
stratify the social sphere, channeling “the original spontaneity of life” into
a rigid social regime. It’s ethical, legal, and moral doctrine is made to
govern thought and conduct, so to produce a conventional knowledge, which has
been reduced to that which can be represented in words, mathematical formulae,
or musical notations. With its ability to define, demarcate, and delimit, the
Confucian meets the Apollonian…The study of television following its Apollonian
and Confucist roots, has primarily been an analyst of content and the passing
of moral judgement based on that content; it is thus we ask for better re-presentation”
of things we “want” to see instead of asking it to make “present” that which it
does not; its expression is overlooked for that which it is supposed to
express.” (Ch. 10, 20-21).
Williams
is arguing that every culture has its own perspective, its own spin on a
subject. They tend to not look at it at face value; they look at it with their
own perspectives. For example, a glass of water with its contents set at
mid-level. One person may look at it and say it’s half-empty, another would say
it’s half-full. Every person in every culture will never take something at face
value; they would just put their own spin on it.
Chapters
eight through ten of I Want My MTV
discuss perception. Everyone perceives the world in his or her unique way as
people with synesthesia and people brought up in different cultures do. However,
there is some universality in how people perceive the world just as it’s proven
one hears better in the dark. And there are ways in which are perception of the
world can be altered or enhanced like how the camera ‘revealed’ what was
hidden, and technology in serving as an extension of our body.








